by Berry Friesen (January 23, 2016)
(The fifth in a series attempting to understand the Trump phenomenon)
It’s cheap and easy to criticize Donald Trump’s “shocking” call for a ban on Muslims entering the US. Reportedly, every other Republican and Democrat running for President has joined the criticism.
It’s cheap and easy to criticize Donald Trump’s “shocking” call for a ban on Muslims entering the US. Reportedly, every other Republican and Democrat running for President has joined the criticism.
Yet none of those candidates has criticized the Obama Administration
for dropping 23,144 bombs on majority-Muslim nations during 2015: 22,110 on Syria and Iraq, 947 on Afghanistan,
58 on Yemen, 18 on Somalia and 11 on Pakistan.
None has criticized the Obama Administration for transforming Libya into
unrelenting chaos and violence, Syria into a place of starvation and death, Yemen
into a wasteland.
So the major-party alternative to Trump is somebody who supports US
wars on Muslim nations, but takes the moral high ground on Muslim immigrants and
refugees. In contrast, Trump’s
supporters pride themselves on straight talk.
In their view, the war on terror is a war against Muslim peoples; if the
US had a leader honest enough to say who the enemy is, maybe it would start
winning its wars.
Dr. Deepa Kumar, professor of media studies at Rutgers University, asks
us not to settle for cheap and easy opposition to Trump’s Islamophobia. Abby Martin’s interview of Dr. Kumar is
mandatory listening for all those who want to go deeper.
Kumar sees in the West “a systematic process . . . to keep fear of
Muslims and fear of terrorism alive in the American imagination.” This process entails “othering,” the
transformation of the disparate followers of Islam into a single group whose
members have certain negative behaviors and attitudes. “Islam is not a race, Muslims are not a race,”
she says. Yet the analogy to racism is
appropriate because “races do not exist naturally, they are produced, typically
by an elite to serve certain agendas.”
Over the past 25 years, the Western elite have been guiding us through such a production
process. Bernard Lewis’ “Roots of Muslim Rage” set the template with its insistence that colonialism, war and the
formation of Israel on Palestinian land had nothing to do with the anger in the Middle East.
Instead, an irrational rage rooted in Islam made conflict between Islam and the
West inevitable.
Samuel Huntington extended this analysis by predicting future world conflicts
would be cultural, not political. As
described by Kumar, this view assumed the empire had arrived at the correct answers
to the big political questions; what remained was irrational opposition rooted
in ignorance, provincialism and religious dogma. Thus, says Kumar, “We don’t need to talk
about the military occupation, we don’t need to talk about war, we don’t need
to talk about drone strikes, we’ll just call it a clash of cultures.”
This is phony baloney, but it has been systematically manufactured in
the West by Hollywood, academia, the think-tanks and the media. “To see Donald Trump as some sort of lone-wolf
who is responsible for the escalation of Islamophobia or who is otherwise
corrupting a great political system is deeply problematic,” says Kumar.
What distinguishes Trump is his blunt discussion of an attitude and worldview
that has been sewn with subtlety into the fabric of American life.
Can we deal with this now that Trump has brought it out into the open?
“Simply doing education around Islamophobia or having interfaith
dialogue is not enough,” says Kumar. “We
need to understand that it’s more than a set of prejudices and bad ideas in
people’s heads; it’s in fact an ideology and set of practices that sustain and
reproduce empire.”
So though we must combat prejudice against Muslims, we can't stop there. We also must “get to the
root of what causes Islamophobia—the empire, the national security state, the neo-liberal
order in which we live and the class power that sustains all of this.”
When we do that, when we recognize how our fears and prejudices have
been produced deliberately for the benefit of the ruling elite, then we will be
able to come together across the lines that divide us now and discredit Islamophobia
and the endless war it legitimizes.